{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Patterns and organ treatment response of Erdheim-Chester disease with cardiac involvement.
{Author}: Miao HL;Chang L;Lin H;Liu ZZ;Wu W;Niu N;Cao XX;
{Journal}: Heart
{Volume}: 110
{Issue}: 13
{Year}: 2024 Jun 17
{Factor}: 7.365
{DOI}: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-323867
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To evaluate the heart response of Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) through continuous follow-up within our large cohort, for which there is a lack of understanding.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients with ECD with cardiac involvement diagnosed at our centre between January 2010 and August 2023. We assessed the heart response by integrating pericardial effusion and metabolic responses.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>A total of 40 patients were included, with a median age of 51.5 years (range: 29-66) and a BRAFV600E mutation rate of 56%. The most common imaging manifestations observed were pericardial effusion (73%), right atrium (70%) and right atrioventricular sulcus infiltration (58%). Among 21 evaluable patients, 18 (86%) achieved a heart response including 5 (24%) complete response (CR) and 13 (62%) partial response (PR). The CR rate of pericardial effusion response was 33%, while the PR rate was 56%. Regarding the cardiac mass response, 33% of patients showed PR. For cardiac metabolic response, 32% and 53% of patients achieved complete and partial metabolic response, respectively. There was a correlation between pericardial effusion response and cardiac metabolic response (r=0.73 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.83), p<0.001). The median follow-up was 50.2 months (range: 1.0-102.8 months). The estimated 5-year overall survival was 78.9%. The median progression-free survival was 59.4 months (95% CI 26.2 to 92.7 months). Patients who received BRAF inhibitors achieved better heart response (p=0.037) regardless of treatment lines.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>We pioneered the evaluation of heart response of ECD considering both pericardial effusion and cardiac metabolic response within our cohort, revealing a correlation between these two indicators. BRAF inhibitors may improve heart response, regardless of the treatment lines.