{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Does the subscapularis refixation affect the clinical outcome after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
{Author}: Ameziane Y;Holschen M;Engel NM;Schorn D;Witt KA;Steinbeck J;
{Journal}: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 May 15
{Factor}: 3.507
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.057
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an established procedure for patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. However, the refixation of the subscapularis tendon remains a controversial and frequently discussed topic. This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of the subscapularis refixation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Fifty patients (f: 36, m:14) were randomized and assigned to either the "repaired" (rep) or the "not repaired" (nrep) cohort. Intraoperatively, the subscapularis tendon was reattached in the rep-cohort with four tendon-to-tendon sutures, whereas no refixation was performed in the nrep-cohort. The Constant-Murley Score (CS) and the range of motion was evaluated preoperatively as well as 12 and 36 months postoperatively. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and the Lift-off test were performed 36 months postoperatively. The postoperative subscapularis integrity was assessed sonographically.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Twelve months postoperatively the rep-cohort presented better results in the CS (rep: 71 vs. nrep: 66, p: 0.037). The normalized CS was 80% in the rep-cohort and 75% in the nrep-cohort (p: 0.114). At our last follow-up after 36 months we did not find significant differences between the rep-cohort and the nrep-cohort in the CS (rep: 76 vs. nrep: 75, p: 0.285) and normalized CS (rep: 91% vs. nrep: 91%, p: 0.388). Concerning internal rotation (in points) the rep-cohort achieved better results than the nrep-cohort (rep: 7.3 vs. nrep: 6.6, p: 0.040). Flexion (rep: 145° vs. nrep: 151°, p: 0.826), abduction (rep: 135° vs. nrep: 137° p: 0.816), external rotation (rep: 34° vs. nrep: 37°, p: 0.817) and the SSV (rep: 81% vs. nrep: 77%, p: 0.398) presented no significant differences between the cohorts. The ultrasound examination after 36 months displayed an intact tendon in 70%.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>While the subscapularis refixation effects the postoperative internal rotation positively, there were no differences in mid-term follow-up concerning the overall results after rTSA. Further, the external rotation is not affected by the refixation of the subscapularis tendon.