{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: A systematic review of subclinical hyperthyroidism guidelines: a remarkable range of recommendations.
{Author}: Ursem SR;Boelen A;Bruinstroop E;Elders PJM;Gussekloo J;Poortvliet RKE;Heijboer AC;den Elzen WPJ;
{Journal}: Eur Thyroid J
{Volume}: 13
{Issue}: 3
{Year}: 2024 Jun 1
{Factor}: 4.084
{DOI}: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0036
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Subclinical thyroid diseases are often the subject of debate concerning their clinical significance, the appropriateness of diagnostic testing, and possible treatment. This systematic review addresses the variation in international guidelines for subclinical hyperthyroidism, focusing on diagnostic workup, treatment, and follow-up recommendations.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and guideline-specific databases and included clinical practice guidelines with recommendations on subclinical hyperthyroidism. Guideline recommendations were extracted, and quality assessment was performed using selected questions of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Of the 2624 records screened, 22 guidelines were included, which were published between 2007 and 2021. Guideline quality was generally intermediate to low. Diagnostic approaches differed substantially, particularly in the extent of recommended testing. Treatment initiation depended on TSH levels, age, and comorbidities, but the level of detail regarding defining precise comorbidities varied. Recommendations for monitoring intervals for follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This review underscores the existing variability in (inter)national guidelines concerning subclinical hyperthyroidism. There isa need for clear recommendations in guidelines considering diagnostic workup, treatment, and follow-up of subclinical hyperthyroidism. In order to establish this, future research should focus on determining clear and evidence-based intervention thresholds.