{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: The psychological reality of the learned "p < .05" boundary.
{Author}: Rao VNV;Bye JK;Varma S;
{Journal}: Cogn Res Princ Implic
{Volume}: 9
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 05 3
{Factor}: 3.657
{DOI}: 10.1186/s41235-024-00553-x
{Abstract}: The .05 boundary within Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing (NHST) "has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move" (to quote Douglas Adams). Here, we move past meta-scientific arguments and ask an empirical question: What is the psychological standing of the .05 boundary for statistical significance? We find that graduate students in the psychological sciences show a boundary effect when relating p-values across .05. We propose this psychological boundary is learned through statistical training in NHST and reading a scientific literature replete with "statistical significance". Consistent with this proposal, undergraduates do not show the same sensitivity to the .05 boundary. Additionally, the size of a graduate student's boundary effect is not associated with their explicit endorsement of questionable research practices. These findings suggest that training creates distortions in initial processing of p-values, but these might be dampened through scientific processes operating over longer timescales.