{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Patient-reported outcomes after oral cancer reconstructions with radial and ulnar forearm-free flaps.
{Author}: Al-Aroomi MA;Al-Worafi NA;Ma Y;Alkebsi K;Mohamed AAS;Jiang C;
{Journal}: Oral Dis
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 May 2
{Factor}: 4.068
{DOI}: 10.1111/odi.14968
{Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported quality of life and incidence of decision regret in patients undergoing radial (RFFF) and ulnar forearm-free flaps (UFFF) reconstruction.
METHODS: Patients undergoing either RFFF or UFFF were assessed with the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaires, and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), both before and at least 12 months post-reconstruction.
RESULTS: In total, 40 RFFF and 40 UFFF were included. Harvesting time was longer in RFFF (p = 0.043), and the donor-site defect was significantly larger in RFFF than in UFFF (p = 0.044). Patients with UFFF scored better UW-QOL in the appearance, pain, activity, mood, and social functioning domains (p < 0.05). However, the RFFF group excelled in swallowing and chewing domains. The DRS score revealed a significant difference between RFFF and UFFF, with scores of 36.26 versus 27.36, respectively. Moreover, the mean DRS score reduced at 12 months compared with 6 months, significantly superior for UFFF.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral cancer patients reconstructed with UFFF exhibited a better appearance, social domain, and mild decision regret compared with RFFF, indicating that the UFFF may contribute to improving postoperative quality of life in oral cancer patients.