{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Functional outcomes of bowel resection versus shaving or disc excision of colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review protocol.
{Author}: Qian W;Gauci C;Chaudhri K;Lung T;Mohtashami A;
{Journal}: BMJ Open
{Volume}: 14
{Issue}: 4
{Year}: 2024 Apr 28
{Factor}: 3.006
{DOI}: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080989
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Endometriosis is a prevalent gynaecological condition for women of reproductive age worldwide. While endometriosis primarily involves the reproductive system, it can also infiltrate additional viscera such as the gastrointestinal tract. Patients with colorectal endometriosis can have severe symptoms that require surgical intervention. There are limited data available to guide the choice of resection technique based on the functional outcomes of bowel resection versus shaving or disc excision in treating colorectal endometriosis. This protocol aims to outline the methods that will be used in a systematic review of the literature comparing the functional outcomes of bowel resection to shaving and disc excision when surgically treating colorectal endometriosis.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Papers will be identified through database searches, scanning reference lists of relevant studies and citation searching of key papers. Two independent reviewers will screen studies against eligibility criteria and extract data using standardised forms. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane will be searched from the beginning of each database until February 2024. The primary outcome is comparing the functional bowel outcomes between the different methods of surgical treatment. Secondary outcome will be quality of life, based on the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score and the incidence of postoperative pain. A meta-analysis will be performed if the data are homogenous.<BR><B>BACKGROUND: </B>This study does not require ethics approval. The results of the systematic review described within this protocol will be disseminated through presentations at relevant conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The methods will be used to inform future reviews.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>CRD42023461711.