{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Newborn Male Circumcision.
{Author}: Walsh HA;
{Journal}: Narrat Inq Bioeth
{Volume}: 13
{Issue}: 2
{Year}: 2023
暂无{DOI}: 10.1353/nib.2023.a909656
{Abstract}: This symposium includes twelve personal narratives from parents about making the decision whether to circumcise their infant male children. The authors of the narratives include five fathers and seven mothers. Nine of the 12 parent authors opted to circumcise their infant sons, though the reasons they stated for doing so varied. Most of the parent authors relied on cultural or social beliefs, religious guidance, or a desire for sameness with the infant's father. Parents who didn't circumcise their male infants discuss their convictions about autonomy, bodily rights, and the medical benefits of circumcision versus the harm or pain caused by the procedure. The symposium includes four expert commentaries on the narratives that are informed and enriched by the commentators' expertise in pediatric bioethics, healthcare ethics, gender studies, Jewish law and tradition, and the medical and surgical techniques of circumcision.