{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Discharge Interventions for Limited English Proficiency Patients: A Scoping Review.
{Author}: Anaya M;Law W;Montoya HL;Moreira CM;
{Journal}: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Apr 19
{Factor}: 3.524
{DOI}: 10.1007/s40615-024-02003-2
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Limited English proficiency patients are required under federal law to receive language-concordant care, yet they still receive substandard discharge instructions compared to English-speaking patients. We aimed to summarize the interventions carried out to improve discharge instructions in the limited English proficiency population.
METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of academic and gray literature from the United States using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies to improve discharge communication.
RESULTS: Of the 3330 studies, 19 studies met the criteria. Core types of interventions included written interventions alone, educational interventions alone, written and educational interventions, audio and visual interventions, and other types of interventions. Even among the same core types of interventions, there were differences in types of interventions, outcomes examined, and results.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of included interventions that studied satisfaction as an outcome measure showed improvement, while the other outcomes were not improved or worsened. More rigorous methodology and community involvement are necessary to further analyze discharge interventions for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP).