{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Are Guideline-concordant Processes of Care Consistent Across the Rural-Urban Continuum? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Adults Newly Treated for Type 2 Diabetes. {Author}: Nagy DK;Bresee LC;Eurich DT;Simpson SH; {Journal}: Can J Diabetes {Volume}: 48 {Issue}: 5 {Year}: 2024 Jul 5 {Factor}: 2.774 {DOI}: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.03.007 {Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to identify the association between place of residence (metropolitan, urban, rural) and guideline-concordant processes of care in the first year of type 2 diabetes management.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of new metformin users between April 2015 and March 2020 in Alberta, Canada. Outcomes were identified as guideline-concordant processes of care through the review of clinical practice guidelines and published literature. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following outcomes were examined by place of residence: dispensation of a statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), eye examination, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), cholesterol, and kidney function testing.
RESULTS: Of 60,222 new metformin users, 67% resided in a metropolitan area, 10% in an urban area, and 23% in a rural area. After confounder adjustment, rural residents were less likely to have a statin dispensed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 0.87) or undergo cholesterol testing (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.90) when compared with metropolitan residents. In contrast, rural residents were more likely to receive A1C and kidney function testing (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.21 and aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.24, respectively). ACEi/ARB use and eye examinations were similar across place of residence.
CONCLUSIONS: Processes of care varied by place of residence. Limited cholesterol management in rural areas is concerning because this may lead to increased cardiovascular outcomes.