{Reference Type}: Systematic Review
{Title}: Sex differences in treatment effect in neuroprotectant trials for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review.
{Author}: Reyes-Esteves S;George DK;Cucchiara B;
{Journal}: J Neurol Sci
{Volume}: 460
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 May 15
{Factor}: 4.553
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122992
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Pre-clinical data suggest sex differences in mechanisms of cerebral ischemic injury. This might result in differential outcomes of putative neuroprotectants by sex, though little systematic data is available to assess this.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We performed a systematic review of multicenter randomized controlled trials published from January 1980-June 2022 enrolling >100 subjects and testing neuroprotectants in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). For each trial, reported treatment effect by sex was extracted. When published results by sex were not available, we contacted individual authors to attempt to retrieve these data.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>We identified 59 publications reporting 64 trials that met inclusion criteria. Of these, data on treatment effect by sex were published for 14/64 trials. Unpublished data for an additional 5 trials were obtained from trial investigators (19/64, or 29.7%). Two trials (one testing uric acid and one dexborneol) reported treatment benefit in women but not men. Pooled analysis of six trials of tirilazad reported worse treatment outcomes in women and no effect in men. No clear difference was apparent in the other trials.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Most trials did not report treatment effect by sex. Of those that did, there was little evidence of systematic sex differences in treatment response.