{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Which devices can be used to decompress odontogenic cystic lesions in the oral cavity? A systematic review.
{Author}: Silva VT;de Campos WG;Leone C;de Abreu Alves F;Lemos CA;
{Journal}: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
{Volume}: 62
{Issue}: 3
{Year}: 2024 Apr 4
{Factor}: 2.018
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.12.015
{Abstract}: Odontogenic cysts are bony lesions in the jaws that can reach large sizes. Decompression, a technique that helps in their surgical treatment, aims to reduce their size. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the main types of device used for the decompression of odontogenic cysts and to analyse the indications, types, advantages, and disadvantages of the devices used. We searched PubMed, Science Direct, LILACS, EMBASE, and Web of Science until February 2023, with no time restriction. We considered studies with a minimum of 10 patients published only in English, those that reported cases and case series, randomised clinical trials of the decompression of odontogenic cysts, and the types of devices used during the decompression period. All reported odontogenic cysts had to have been confirmed by biopsy in their respective publications. We found 713 articles in the selected databases. After removing duplicates, 499 remained. After reading the titles and abstracts, we excluded 461 articles so 38 remained. Nine studies were selected for the review, totalling 244 patients. A total of 206 lesions were identified and confirmed by anatomopathological examination: 123 keratocysts, 40 dentigerous cysts, 34 radicular cysts, one cyst of epithelial origin but without specification, and eight unicystic ameloblastomas. Although we did not find out which device is best for the decompression of odontogenic cysts, our findings show that those that are most effective should be as comfortable as possible and should remain in place. They should have stability in the oral cavity and be easy for the patient to clean.