{Reference Type}: Systematic Review
{Title}: Surgical management of adult acquired buried penis syndrome: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments.
{Author}: Thornton SM;Seitz AJ;Edalatpour A;Poore SO;
{Journal}: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
{Volume}: 91
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Apr 6
{Factor}: 3.022
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.009
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>Adult acquired buried penis (AABP) is a morbid condition often necessitating surgical intervention. Accurate assessment of pre- and postoperative symptoms is crucial to understand how AABP impacts a patients' quality of life, verify surgical effectiveness, and practice patient-centered care. There is no validated patient-reported outcome instrument specific for AABP evaluation. We undertook a comprehensive review of existing literature on patient-reported outcome instruments post-AABP surgery to highlight the importance of developing a specific tool.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 guidelines, we queried three databases using relevant keywords (e.g., "buried penis repair"). Inclusion criteria were studies that discussed surgical management of AABP with patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric and congenital cases were excluded. Information collected included study design, level of evidence, number of participants included in the study, etiology of buried penis, surgical technique, preoperative or postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and patient-reported outcome instrument used.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Initial query identified 998 records. After abstract screening and applying the inclusion or exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles with 440 patients were included. Eight studies implemented patient-reported outcome instruments. The international index of erectile dysfunction-5 and Likert satisfaction scales were used most frequently. Although all instruments were validated, none were validated in the specific context of AABP surgical intervention.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>There is considerable heterogeneity within the AABP literature regarding patient symptomatology, postoperative complications, patient-reported outcomes, and instruments used. The results of this study emphasize the need for a patient-reported outcome measure to examine the influence of AABP repair on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life.