{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Trauma surgical simulation: discussing the replacement of live animals used as human patient simulators.
{Author}: Swain C;Stathakarou N;Alzuguren P;Lemarteleur V;Moffatt R;Karlgren K;
{Journal}: Adv Simul (Lond)
{Volume}: 9
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Feb 12
暂无{DOI}: 10.1186/s41077-024-00279-2
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Despite advances in simulator technology, live anaesthetised animals continue to be used as human patient simulators for medical professionals to practice techniques in the management of surgical trauma. This article describes the process of convening a working group of individuals with a professional interest in simulation to discuss the use of live animals and consider if and how they can be replaced in the future.
METHODS: A working group was formed of voluntary attendees to a workshop held at the SESAM 2023 conference. Iterative discussions reflecting on the topic were used to produce statements summarising the working group's opinions. The working group determined that live animals are used as human patient simulators due to the presence of accurate and responsive physiology in the presence of bleeding, realistic tissue tactility and an emotional response experienced by the learner due to interaction with the animal. They were unable to reach a consensus on replacement, determining that there is currently no single model which is able to provide all the learning aspects which a live animal model can provide. Several suggestions were made regarding development of technologies and pedagogical change.
CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of live animals in surgical simulation is not straightforward but should be an aspiration, if possible. For the ongoing development of trauma surgical simulation models, it is important to combine the knowledge, skills and perspectives of medical stakeholders and educators, academic researchers and industry experts in producing alternative options to the use of live animal simulators.