{Reference Type}: Case Reports
{Title}: The effectiveness ORIF for neglected periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty: A case report.
{Author}: Putra DP;Mustamsir E;Phatama KY;Pradana AS;Pratama YA;
{Journal}: Int J Surg Case Rep
{Volume}: 115
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jan 21
暂无{DOI}: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109285
{Abstract}: UNASSIGNED: Periprosthetic fractures are a growing concern due to the increasing frequency of primary joint replacement surgery, with total hip arthroplasty being the most common. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after revision surgery ranges from 4 to 11 %, with up to 30 % reported after knee revision surgery. This case report aims to describe the treatment of an 81-year-old woman suffering from neglected periprosthetic femoral fracture post hemiarthroplasty.
METHODS: An 81-year-old woman with a history of hemiarthroplasty surgery and hypertension was admitted to the ER with pain in her right thigh. She had a middle shaft femoral fracture and was scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation. Despite being fully conscious and having an average pulse rate and blood pressure, she had cardiomegaly and congestive pulmonum. Unfortunately, this patient did not receive appropriate medical treatment after it occurred for 1 month. After surgery, we evaluated the implant, and the implant stabilized the fracture. After 1-3 months after surgery, the LEFS (The Lower Extremity Functional Scale) score was found that the score increase significantly after surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The Vancouver classification system manages periprosthetic fractures by assessing location, stability, and bone quality. Type A fractures involve the trochanter, while type B fractures are diaphyseal and can extend distally. ORIF is used for subtype B1 fractures, but newer techniques offer shorter operating times and fewer complications.
CONCLUSIONS: From this study, we can conclude that even though neglected cases procedure with ORIF promises a good outcome based on clinical evaluation.