{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Chest wall reconstruction, prosthesis and allografts: a narrative review.
{Author}: Girotti PNC;Bianchi F;
{Journal}: J Thorac Dis
{Volume}: 15
{Issue}: 12
{Year}: 2023 Dec 30
{Factor}: 3.005
{DOI}: 10.21037/jtd-23-650
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>What is the best material in the case of prosthesis used to replace major chest wall resection is still unknown. We reviewed most significant literature focused on the type of prosthetic materials available by highlighting their relative pros and cons.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>We reviewed most significant articles, including clinical results of relevant case series (retrospective studies), published in English in the last 23 years: PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were used in our search in the period between the 1st January 1999 and 31st December 2022.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Overall, our literature review revealed lack of uniformity or conformity in the surgical strategies described for chest wall reconstruction with no internationally accepted standard in terms of decisions and optimal prosthetic materials and type of prostheses (soft, rigid, biological). Despite the increased interest in chest wall reconstruction, we observed a general lack of substantial prospective and multicentric studies. Likewise, there are not substantial data which may guide to the choice of optimal prosthetics in terms of characteristics and biocompatibility.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>A variety of materials are available for reconstruction, including synthetic and biological meshes, flexible and rigid patches, and metal osteosynthesis systems. The material chosen should be optimized to each patient and damaged tissues to be restored. Prospective and multicentric studies are necessary to address current limits in this surgical field.