{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Naturally nutrient rich (NNR) score and the risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study.
{Author}: Hassanpour Ardekanizadeh N;Mousavi Mele M;Mohammadi S;Shekari S;Zeinalabedini M;Masoumvand M;Mousavi Shalmani SH;Askarpour SA;Gholamalizadeh M;Vahid F;Doaei S;
{Journal}: BMJ Open Gastroenterol
{Volume}: 10
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2023 12 2
暂无{DOI}: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001242
{Abstract}: The association between colorectal cancer (CRC) and nutrients has been studied frequently. However, the association of nutrient density of diets with the risk of CRC has been less studied. This study aimed to investigate the association between CRC and naturally nutrient rich (NNR) score in Iranian adults.<BR>This case-control study included 160 patients with colorectal cancer and 320 controls aged 35-70 years in Tehran, Iran. Dietary intake was assessed using a 168-item food frequency questionnaire. The NNR score was obtained by calculating the average daily value of 14 nutrients including protein, vitamins A, C, D, E, B1, B2, B12, calcium, zinc, iron, folate, potassium and unsaturated fatty acids.<BR>Regarding dietary intake of the components of NNR score, the case group had a lower intake of polyunsaturated fat (15.41±4.44 vs 16.54±4.20 g/day, p=0.01), vitamin E (10.15±4.16 vs 13.1±5.33; p=0.001), vitamin B1 (2±0.86 vs 2.19±0.84 mg/day, p=0.03) and folate (516.45±96.59 vs 571.05±80.31; p=0.001) and a higher intake of oleic acid (8.21±5.46 vs 5.59±3.17 g/day, p=0.01) compared with the control group. Colorectal cancer risk was inversely associated with the NNR score after adjusting for the confounders (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97; p=0.03).<BR>Low NNR scores may be linked to CRC. If confirmed by future longitudinal research, this result may help prevent CRC by recommending nutrient-rich diets.