{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Status of epilepsy care delivery and referral in clinics, hospitals, and epilepsy centers in Japan: A nationwide survey.
{Author}: Tokumoto K;Terada K;Kawaguchi N;Nishida T;Yamano M;Aoyagi T;Tadokoro Y;Usui N;Inoue Y;
{Journal}: Epilepsia Open
{Volume}: 9
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Feb 4
{Factor}: 4.026
{DOI}: 10.1002/epi4.12874
{Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: Collaboration among medical facilities is crucial to deliver comprehensive epilepsy care to a diverse and large population of people with epilepsy. We conducted a survey among medical facilities of various sizes throughout Japan to investigate the status of epilepsy care delivery, functioning, and referral.
METHODS: With the cooperation of the Japan Neurological Society (1428 facilities), Japanese Neurosurgical Society (3489 specialists), and Epilepsy Care Network (948 facilities), a questionnaire was mailed to 5865 locations that provide epilepsy care in Japan. The facilities were classified into clinics (19 beds or less), small hospitals (SH, 20-199 beds), large hospitals (LH, 200 beds or more), and epilepsy centers (EC). The status of epilepsy care delivery, functioning, and referral was compared among the four groups.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 1014 facilities (17.3% response rate). After excluding duplicate responses, 957 facilities were analyzed (394 clinics, 149 SH, 388 LH, 26 EC). EC responded "manageable" in more items of epilepsy care functions in general, especially those related to epilepsy surgery, compared to LH with similar facility size. However, EC responded being less manageable in psychiatric service (61.5%), dietary therapy (46.2%), rehabilitation (53.8%), and patient employment support (61.5%). The percentage of facilities that responded "always able to refer" was highest in clinics (67.6%) and the lowest in EC (40%). Referral difficulties were more commonly encountered in EC, and less common in clinics. In EC, the most common reason for inability to refer was patient or family refusal (64%).
CONCLUSIONS: We have clarified the epilepsy care delivery, functioning, and referral in facilities of various sizes in Japan. This study highlights the issues of downward referral and patient stagnation in EC, which have not received much attention.
CONCLUSIONS: A nationwide survey of healthcare facilities ranging in size from small clinics to large hospitals in Japan examined medical care delivery and patient referrals related to epilepsy. Compared to other facilities, epilepsy centers provided a variety of medical services to people with epilepsy but were inadequate in addressing psychiatric symptoms, providing dietary therapy, rehabilitation, and patient employment support. Referrals from epilepsy centers to other medical facilities were often refused by patients and their families. This results in patient crowding at epilepsy centers.