{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study.
{Author}: Ma X;Duan Y;Ma Y;Gao Z;Zhang H;
{Journal}: BMC Med Educ
{Volume}: 23
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2023 Nov 12
{Factor}: 3.263
{DOI}: 10.1186/s12909-023-04827-8
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Clarifying the effectiveness of co-teaching in medicine and nursing (CMN) is important as it is crucial in clinical practice to improve the quality of patient care and prognosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of CMN in nurse anesthetist training.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The study comprised a 6-month training session and a before-and-after controlled study. In total, 59 nurses were recruited. The first 30 nurses were enrolled in the conventional single-teaching in nursing (SN) group and only took nursing-related courses. The next 29 students were enrolled in the CMN group and received both general medical and nursing-specific curricula. Before and after training, medical and nursing collaboration competency scores and knowledge scores were compared between the two groups. At the end of the study, qualitative comments on teaching satisfaction and clinical reasoning skills improvement were queried, and content analysis was performed.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Participants in the CMN group outperformed those in the SN group in tests of medical and nursing collaboration abilities as well as knowledge. The CMN group outperformed the SN group in terms of teaching satisfaction evaluation, particularly in terms of fostering learning in the anesthetist specialty, improving clinical practice, fostering motivation, and influencing how people think about challenges at work. Furthermore, participants in the CMN group felt that their clinical reasoning abilities had improved.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>In comparison to the SN group, the CMN group had enhanced outcomes of patient care, medical and nursing collaboration, and clinical reasoning skills.