{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Non-vascularised corticocancellous (tricortical) iliac bone graft longer than 3 cm for non-union after failed surgical treatment.
{Author}: Cha SM;Pai A;Lee HJ;Shin HD;
{Journal}: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
{Volume}: 88
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 01 17
{Factor}: 3.022
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.069
{Abstract}: We hypothesised that traditional iliac tricortical bone grafts (no vascularised) still have a reasonable role in promoting satisfactory bony healing in non-union defects of certain sizes. Here, we report the clinical/radiological outcomes through a retrospective case series.<BR>We screened 74 patients with definitive non-union in the long bones of the upper extremities who visited the outpatient department from 2008 to 2018. Among these patients, 25 who met our inclusion/exclusion criteria were investigated.<BR>The mean age was 51.92 years, and there were 12, 9, 1, and 3 lesions of the radius, ulna, clavicle, and humerus, respectively. The tools for primary fixations were plate and intramedullary nails in 24 and 1 patients, respectively. Six patients presented with atrophic non-union. The mean period from a previous surgery was 6.84 months. The mean defective bone sizes were 1.81 and 3.50 cm pre-debridement and post-debridement, respectively. All devices had locking plates longer than the previous plate, and the graft was concurrently fixed by screws in three patients. At a mean of 15.92 weeks after the revision surgery, all patients experienced union. At the final follow-up, the clinical outcomes were satisfactory. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were found according to the lesion, type of non-union, period from the previous surgery, or harvest length of the iliac bone.<BR>If the proper indications and some technical aspects are considered, a non-vascularised iliac bone graft longer than 3 cm could still be a reasonable option for treating diaphyseal non-union of the upper extremities.<BR>Level IV, retrospective case series.