{Reference Type}: Review
{Title}: Defensive medicine through the lens of the managerial perspective: a literature review.
{Author}: Pischedda G;MarinĂ² L;Corsi K;
{Journal}: BMC Health Serv Res
{Volume}: 23
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2023 Oct 17
{Factor}: 2.908
{DOI}: 10.1186/s12913-023-10089-3
{Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: Several studies have been carried out on defensive medicine, but research from the managerial viewpoint is still scarce. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a literature review to better understand defensive medicine from a managerial perspective.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted of studies focusing on the organisational (meso) level of healthcare providers and managerial practices. A final sample of 28 studies was processed.
RESULTS: Defensive medicine has mainly been studied in the USA, and scholars have principally used quantitative surveys. High-risk specialities have been a critical field of investigation, and a large portion of the papers are published in journals that cover medicine, health policy, education and law fields. The analysis showed that operations and the organisation of staffing were the most discussed managerial practices. No study considered planning and budgeting aspects.
CONCLUSIONS: The review confirmed that the managerial aspect of defensive medicine has not been fully addressed. Stimulated by this gap, this study analyses the managerial background of the defensive medicine phenomenon and shows which managerial practices have been most analysed. This paper also contributes to developing the literature on defensive medicine from the managerial side. Areas for future research include qualitative studies to investigate the behaviour of managers of healthcare companies to give a different perspective on defensive medicine and organisations' decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: Some important publications might have been missed in this work because of the choice of only two databases. A further limit could be imposed by the use of the English language as an inclusion criterion.