{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Quality of Medication Cost Conversations and Interest in Future Cost Conversations Among Older Adults.
{Author}: Everson J;Besaw RJ;Whitmore CC;Joseph Mattingly T;Sinaiko AD;Keating NL;Everson NS;Dusetzina SB;
{Journal}: J Gen Intern Med
{Volume}: 38
{Issue}: 16
{Year}: 2023 Dec 14
{Factor}: 6.473
{DOI}: 10.1007/s11606-023-08388-w
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Medication cost conversations occur less frequently than patients prefer, and it is unclear whether patients have positive experiences with them when they do occur.
OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' experiences discussing their medication costs with their health care team.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey.
METHODS: Nationally representative survey fielded in the United States in 2022 (response rate = 48.5%).
METHODS: 1020 adults over age 65.
METHODS: Primary measures were adapted from Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers Survey visit survey v4.0 and captured patients' experiences of medication cost conversations. Additional measures captured patients' interest in future cost conversations, the type of clinicians with whom they would be comfortable discussing costs, and sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 1020 respondents who discussed medication prices with their health care team, 39.3% were 75 or older and 78.6% were non-Hispanic White. Forty-three percent of respondents indicated that their prior medication cost conversation was not easy to understand; 3% indicated their health care team was not respectful and 26% indicated their health care team was somewhat respectful during their last conversation; 48% indicated that there was not enough time. Those reporting that their prior discussion was not easy to understand or that their clinician was not definitely respectful were less likely to be interested in future discussions. Only 6% and 10% of respondents indicated being comfortable discussing medication prices with financial counselors or social workers, respectively. Few differences in responses were observed by survey participant characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional survey of prior experiences may be subject to recall bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults who engaged in prior medication cost conversations, many report that these conversations are not easy to understand and that almost one-third of clinicians were somewhat or not respectful. Efforts to increase the frequency of medication cost conversations should consider parallel interventions to ensure the discussions are effective at informing prescribing decisions and reducing cost-related medication nonadherence.