{Reference Type}: Observational Study
{Title}: An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model.
{Author}: Wallace J;Hoehn-Velasco L;Tilden E;Dowd BE;Calvin S;Jolles DR;Wright J;Stapleton S;
{Journal}: Health Serv Res
{Volume}: 59
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Feb 10
{Factor}: 3.734
{DOI}: 10.1111/1475-6773.14222
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To assess key birth outcomes in an alternative maternity care model, midwifery-based birth center care.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry and birth certificate files, using national data collected from 2009 to 2019.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This observational cohort study compared key clinical birth outcomes of women at low risk for perinatal complications, comparing those who received care in the midwifery-based birth center model versus hospital-based usual care. Linear regression analysis was used to assess key clinical outcomes in the midwifery-based group as compared with hospital-based usual care. The hospital-based group was selected using nearest neighbor matching, and the primary linear regressions were weighted using propensity score weights (PSWs). The key clinical outcomes considered were cesarean delivery, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, breastfeeding, and neonatal death. We performed sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weights and entropy balancing weights. We also assessed the remaining role of omitted variable bias using a bounding methodology.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Women aged 16-45 with low-risk pregnancies, defined as a singleton fetus and no record of hypertension or cesarean section, were included. The sample was selected for records that overlapped in each year and state. Counties were included if there were at least 50 midwifery-based birth center births and 300 total births. After matching, the sample size of the birth center cohort was 85,842 and the hospital-based cohort was 261,439.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Women receiving midwifery-based birth center care experienced lower rates of cesarean section (-12.2 percentage points, p < 0.001), low birth weight (-3.2 percentage points, p < 0.001), NICU admission (-5.5 percentage points, p < 0.001), neonatal death (-0.1 percentage points, p < 0.001), and higher rates of breastfeeding (9.3 percentage points, p < 0.001).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>This analysis supports midwifery-based birth center care as a high-quality model that delivers optimal outcomes for low-risk maternal/newborn dyads.