{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Long-term clinical and radiological results after scaphoid non-union treatment: a retrospective study about 60 cases.
{Author}: Delamarre M;Leroy M;Barbarin M;Chantelot C;Saab M;
{Journal}: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
{Volume}: 34
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Jan 28
暂无{DOI}: 10.1007/s00590-023-03687-8
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>Scaphoid non-union treatment remains nonconsensual and is based on vascularized or non-vascularized bone grafting. This study aimed to evaluate with a long follow-up the functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes, reported complications and reoperations and studied non-union treatment prognostic factors.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Patients who had undergone bone graft surgery for scaphoid non-union were retrospectively reviewed. The evaluated outcomes were pain, qDASH, PRWE and MWS scores, active range of motion, grip strength, union rate, scapholunate angle, carpal height, and presence of arthrosis. Complications and reinterventions were also reported.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>This study included 60 scaphoid non-union treatments with a mean follow-up of 7.7 (1.5-20.3) years. Twenty (33.3%) non-unions were located at the proximal pole, including 6 (10%) with preoperative avascular necrosis (AVN). Union occurred in 51 patients (85%). The functional, clinical, and radiological results were good. The complication rate was 21.3% and the reintervention rate was 16.7%. Subgroup union rate analysis found no difference if the non-union is localized in the proximal pole or if there is AVN.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>With a representative sample of the population and a long follow-up, we have found a good union rate, clinical and functional results regardless of the treatment method chosen. Scaphoid non-union treatment is still controversial and more studies are needed to accurate indications of each graft according to the patient and non-union characteristics.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Retrospective cohort study.