{Reference Type}: Systematic Review
{Title}: Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for the Preoperative Assessment of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review.
{Author}: Adriani M;Saccomanno MF;Motta M;Galli S;Milano G;
{Journal}: Am J Sports Med
{Volume}: 52
{Issue}: 3
{Year}: 2024 Mar 15
{Factor}: 7.01
{DOI}: 10.1177/03635465231166077
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most common modality for assessment of the rotator cuff before and after surgery. Several classifications have been described aiming to define main tear characteristics. However, there is still confusion when it comes to the reliability of those classifications.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>(1) To identify all MR classifications available in the literature for preoperative assessment of rotator cuff tears, (2) to summarize available data on the reliability of identified classifications, and (3) to assess the methodological quality of reliability studies.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All studies reporting MR assessment in patients with a superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear were included. After identification of the available MR criteria, reliability studies were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>A total of 75 studies were included in this review. Eight categories of outcomes could be identified. Of the total, 62 studies reported interobserver reliability whereas 32 reported intraobserver reliability of some of the identified criteria. Each category reflected a variety of reliability, ranging from poor to excellent agreement. MR proved to be a reliable imaging modality to detect the structural integrity of the posterosuperior cuff, especially in cases of full-thickness tear; it was also reliable in terms of tear width and length and muscle atrophy based on a tangent sign or Thomazeau classification. All other classifications did not prove acceptable reliability. Methodological quality was high for 23 articles and moderate for 14.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Preoperative MR is a reliable imaging modality to identify full-thickness tears, measure tear size and morphology, and identify muscle atrophy with tangent sign or Thomazeau classification. All other outcomes and classifications did not show acceptable reliability; therefore, caution is needed when using them for preoperative evaluation of a rotator cuff tear.