{Reference Type}: Historical Article
{Title}: Ethicizing history. Bioethical representations of Nazi medicine.
{Author}: Schütz M;Braswell H;
{Journal}: Bioethics
{Volume}: 37
{Issue}: 6
{Year}: 2023 07 29
{Factor}: 2.512
{DOI}: 10.1111/bioe.13168
{Abstract}: The article presents and analyzes different approaches of U.S. bioethicists in comprehending the Nazi medical crimes after 1945. The account is divided into two sections: one dealing with discussions on research ethics and the Nuremberg Code up until the 1970s and the other ranging from the 1970s to the present and highlighting bioethics' engagement with Nazi analogies. The portrayal of different bioethical scholars, institutions, and documents-most notably Henry K. Beecher, Jay Katz, the Belmont Report, the Hastings Center, Arthur L. Caplan, and Robert M. Veatch-provides a nuanced interpretation of the motives that bioethicists held and the strategies that they applied to establish an understanding of the Nazi medical crimes and their relation to contemporary bioethical issues. In this, the different approaches shared a common goal: To integrate the Nazi medical crimes into an ethical framework by means of selective acknowledgments and representation of their history.