{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Physical performance tasks were linked to the PROMIS physical function metric in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
{Author}: Liegl G;Fischer FH;Woodward M;Török M;Strippoli GFM;Hegbrant J;Davenport A;Cromm K;Canaud B;Bots ML;Blankestijn PJ;Barth C;Fischer KI;Rose M;
{Journal}: J Clin Epidemiol
{Volume}: 159
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2023 07 25
{Factor}: 7.407
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.04.007
{Abstract}: To investigate whether a multi-item performance outcome measure, the physical performance test (PPT), can be calibrated to a common scale with patient-reported outcome measures, using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) metric.
We analyzed baseline data (N = 1,113) from the CONVINCE study, an international trial in end-stage kidney disease patients comparing high-dose hemodiafiltration with high-flux hemodialysis. Assumptions of item response theory (IRT) modelling were investigated for the combined set of the nine-item PPT and a four-item PROMIS PF short form (PROMIS-PF4a). We applied unidimensional IRT linking for calibrating the PPT to the PROMIS PF metric.
Although some evidence for multidimensionality was found, classical test statistics (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.93), Mokken (Loevinger's H = 0.50), and bifactor analysis (explained common variance = 0.65) indicated that PPT and PROMIS-PF4a items can be used to assess a common PF construct. On the group level, the agreement between PROMIS-PF4a and linked PPT scores was stable across several subsamples. On the individual level, scores differed considerably.
We found preliminary evidence that the PPT can be linked to the PROMIS PF metric in hemodialysis patients, enabling group comparisons across patient-reported outcome and performance outcome measures. Alternative linking methods should be applied in future studies using a more comprehensive PROMIS PF item set.