{Reference Type}: Multicenter Study
{Title}: Clinical relevance of plasma EBV DNA as a biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in non-endemic areas: A multicenter study in southwestern China.
{Author}: He Q;Zhou Y;Zhou J;Zhao D;Li L;Li X;Huang Y;Wang Q;Zou H;Zhang K;Li Y;Wang Z;Deng Y;Meng F;Ying B;Yang M;Wang D;
{Journal}: Clin Chim Acta
{Volume}: 541
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: Feb 2023 15
{Factor}: 6.314
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117244
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Numerous clinical studies have validated plasma EBV DNA as a reliable biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) screening, tumor load monitoring, and prognosis prediction in endemic regions. However, the clinical relevance of plasma EBV DNA as a biomarker for NPC in non-endemic areas is still unclear.
METHODS: The pretreatment plasma EBV DNA of 1405 newly diagnosed NPC patients from three major regional hospitals in non-endemic areas were analyzed retrospectively. The medical records of 244 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals were reviewed. EBV DNA was detected using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Based on the baseline of 400 and 0 copies/mL, the distribution characteristics of the pretreatment EBV DNA load in different clinical stages and geographic regions were analyzed. The diagnostic value of pretreatment plasma EBV DNA for NPC with two baselines was evaluated using the ROC curve.
RESULTS: NPC patients had a significantly higher pretreatment EBV DNA level than healthy controls (P<0.001). Pretreatment EBV DNA was closely associated with clinical and TNM stages in non-endemic areas, as it was in endemic areas. However, when 400 copies/mL set as the detection baseline, the sensitivity and specificity for NPC diagnosis were 40.8 % and 100 %, respectively (AUC = 0.704, cut off = 200.5 copies/mL). This sensitivity was lower than that reported in endemic regions (41.5 % - 97.1 %). Lower sensitivity may result in false negatives, missing diagnoses during NPC screening. Further investigation revealed that 39.7 % (558/1405) of NPC patients had detectable EBV DNA and S amplification curves. Optimizing the detection limit to 0 copies/mL, the sensitivity could be improved to 80.5 % (AUC = 0.901).
CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, the clinical significance of plasma EBV DNA as a biomarker for NPC was restricted due to the low detection limit of 400 copies/mL. More efficient nucleic acid extraction and detection methods are needed to optimize the detection limit and increase the clinical application of plasma EBV DNA for NPC.