{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: The use of objective assessments in the evaluation of technical skills in cardiothoracic surgery: a systematic review.
{Author}: Hussein N;Van den Eynde J;Callahan C;Guariento A;Gollmann-Tepeköylü C;Elbatarny M;Loubani M;Hussein N;Van den Eynde J;Callahan C;Guariento A;Gollmann-Tepeköylü C;Elbatarny M;Loubani M;
{Journal}: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
{Volume}: 35
{Issue}: 3
{Year}: 08 2022 3
{Factor}: 1.978
{DOI}: 10.1093/icvts/ivac194
{Abstract}: With reductions in training time and intraoperative exposure, there is a need for objective assessments to measure trainee progression. This systematic review focuses on the evaluation of trainee technical skill performance using objective assessments in cardiothoracic surgery and its incorporation into training curricula.<BR>Databases (EBSCOHOST, Scopus and Web of Science) and reference lists of relevant articles for studies that incorporated objective assessment of technical skills of trainees/residents in cardiothoracic surgery were included. Data extraction included task performed; assessment setting and tool used; number/level of assessors; study outcome and whether the assessments were incorporated into training curricula. The methodological rigour of the studies was scored using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).<BR>Fifty-four studies were included for quantitative synthesis. Six were randomized-controlled trials. Cardiac surgery was the most common speciality utilizing objective assessment methods with coronary anastomosis the most frequently tested task. Likert-based assessment tools were most commonly used (61%). Eighty-five per cent of studies were simulation-based with the rest being intraoperative. Expert surgeons were primarily used for objective assessments (78%) with 46% using blinding. Thirty (56%) studies explored objective changes in technical performance with 97% demonstrating improvement. The other studies were primarily validating assessment tools. Thirty-nine per cent of studies had established these assessment tools into training curricula. The mean ± standard deviation MERSQI score for all studies was 13.6 ± 1.5 demonstrating high validity.<BR>Despite validated technical skill assessment tools being available and demonstrating trainee improvement, their regular adoption into training curricula is lacking. There is a need to incorporate these assessments to increase the efficiency and transparency of training programmes for cardiothoracic surgeons.