{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Quality of life after reconstruction of traumatic orbital floor defects using titanium mesh and medpore: A randomised controlled trial.
{Author}: Gupta S;Mehrotra D;Singh PK;U V;Bhave S;Katrolia R;
{Journal}: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
{Volume}: 11
{Issue}: 2
{Year}: Apr-Jun 2021
暂无{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.01.012
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of orbital floor reconstruction with two types of orbital implants and assess patients' quality of life.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>39 sequential patients with clinical and radiological evidence of orbital floor fracture, presenting diplopia, enophthalmos, paraesthesia or a post traumatic residual orbital deformity were included in this study and randomised for orbital floor reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheet (Biopore™) or preshaped titanium mesh on a 3D model. Their pre and postoperative quality of life were compared. Success rate was assessed and scored with a minimum of zero (none) and a maximum of ten (excellent) for improvement in the signs of diplopia, enophthalmos, hypoglobus, paraesthesia and aesthetics.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Both QOL scores and Success score was greater in cases which reconstruction of orbital floor was performed with preshaped titanium mesh as compared to those with Biopore™.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Preshaped titanium mesh shows better results than reconstruction with Biopore™. However a large sample size and a long term follow up is needed for generating the best evidence. Quality of life extensively improves after orbital floor reconstruction motivating the patients desire to live.