{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Improving adherence to lung cancer guidelines: a quality improvement project that uses chart review, audit and feedback approach. {Author}: Jazieh A;Alkaiyat MO;Ali Y;Hashim MA;Abdelhafiz N;Al Olayan A; {Journal}: BMJ Open Qual {Volume}: 8 {Issue}: 3 {Year}: 2019 暂无{DOI}: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000436 {Abstract}: UNASSIGNED: The implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines is one of the most effective interventions for improving quality of care. A gap between guidelines and clinical practice often exists, which may result in patients not receiving appropriate care. This project aimed at improving adherence to lung cancer guidelines at our institution.
UNASSIGNED: The records of patients with lung cancer were evaluated for adherence to guidelines by using an auditing tool that was developed to capture pertinent information. The study team collected data about the following variables: compliance with documentation of pathological diagnosis, documentation of disease stage prior to treatment initiation, presentation at thoracic tumour board within 30 days of diagnosis, management course, and management of end of life in terms of early 'no code' initiation, stopping chemotherapy and referral to palliative care prior to 2 weeks of death. Annual audits were performed from 2012 to 2015. Education and discussion with team members to address the deviations were the main interventions to improve adherence.
UNASSIGNED: The baseline measurements were taken in 2012 (49 patients). Histological subtype identification improved from 94% to 100%. Presentation of new cases at the tumour board improved from 35% to 82%. Testing for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation for non-squamous cell lung cancer improved from 77% to 100%. The staging was documented in 100% of the cases.
UNASSIGNED: Running audits to monitor adherence to guidelines and discussions with the team have a positive effect on providing consistent evidence-based care for patients with lung cancer.