{Reference Type}: Case Reports
{Title}: [Uncommon mycoses].
{Author}: Viñuela L;Domínguez-Gil M;de Frutos M;López-Urrutia L;Ramos C;Eiros JM;
{Journal}: Rev Iberoam Micol
{Volume}: 36
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: Jan 2019 0
{Factor}: 1.385
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.riam.2018.07.006
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Fungal infections should be suspected in severe wounds that have been contaminated with organic material or soil, even when the patient is immunocompetent. The aim of this article is to contribute to a better understanding and knowledge of the antifungal sensitivity and epidemiology of some rare pathogens that may trigger severe infections.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Four different moulds were isolated from the wounds of an immunocompetent woman who was involved in a road accident: Lichtheimia corymbifera, Scedosporium boydii, Fusarium solani and Purpureocillium lilacinum. Some of them were isolated from different sites. A profile of in vitro resistance was performed with an Epsilometer (Etest™) using five antifungal agents: voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, anidulafungin an amphotericin B. The results obtained were consistent with those from other cases reported in the literature.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Early aggressive surgery, antifungal therapy and, above all, frequent debridement of necrotic tissue, are the tools against filamentous fungi infections. Antifungal sensitivity of any mould involved in an infection has to be determined, in order to a better understanding of these rare pathogens whose incidence is increasing.