{Reference Type}: Comparative Study
{Title}: A Two-Stage Cepstral Analysis Procedure for the Classification of Rough Voices.
{Author}: Awan SN;Awan JA;
{Journal}: J Voice
{Volume}: 34
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: Jan 2020
{Factor}: 2.3
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.003
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of a two-stage method of cepstral peak identification to effectively discriminate rough vs breathy vs typical voice in sustained vowel productions. It was hypothesized that a dual-stage search for cepstral peak prominences (CPP's) above and below specified quefrency/F0 cutoffs would result in a CPP difference that would be characteristic of the rough, diplophonic voice type.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Central one-second portions of sustained vowel /a/ productions were obtained from 90 subjects (rough, breathy, and normophonic voices). All voice samples were analyzed using a a two-stage cepstral analysis process in which a CPPHigh-Low difference value was obtained by identifying cepstral peaks above and below a lower limit for expected F0 (150 Hz for females and 90 Hz for males), called CPPHigh and CPPLow respectively.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The CPPHigh-Low difference value was observed to be a highly significant predictor, with negative values for this parameter characteristic of a dominant subharmonic in the voice signal and the perception of diplophonic, rough voice. Correct classification of rough vs nonrough voice samples was 82.2% (sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.833). In the consideration of three group classification (breathy vs. normophonic vs. rough), models incorporating two predictors (the CPP obtained from a single search through a 60 to 300 Hz frequency range (CPPDefault) and the CPPHigh-Low difference value) correctly classified 78.88% of the voice samples.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Rough, diplophonic voices were consistently observed to have a subharmonic peak that was greater in amplitude than the cepstral peak obtained within the region of the expected F0, resulting in a negative value for the CPPHigh-Low difference. The two-stage cepstral analysis process described herein is visually intuitive from the graphical display of a cepstrum and is a simple extended calculation derived from cepstral analysis procedures that have been recommended as essential in the acoustic description of vocal quality.