{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Clinical Outcomes of Primary and Revision Untethering Surgery in Patients with Tethered Cord Syndrome and Spinal Bifida.
{Author}: Sun J;Zhang Y;Wang H;Wang Y;Yang Y;Kong Q;Xu X;Shi J;
{Journal}: World Neurosurg
{Volume}: 116
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: Aug 2018
{Factor}: 2.21
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.221
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is an increasingly recognized clinical condition, with untethering surgery considered the classically effective treatment. Yet, as evidence has aggregated, the surgical outcomes of untethering remain controversial. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent primary or revision untethering.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Spine Surgery of Changzheng Hospital between January and December 2016. Patients with TCS who underwent untethering surgery were recruited for the study. Information collected included demographic data, main clinical manifestations, and outcomes after untethering surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (60 males and 52 females) were included in this study, with mean follow-up of 13.7 years. The surgical outcomes of the primary untethering varied among symptoms, with remission rates of 30.0% for pain, 24.4% for paresthesia, 18.6% for motor deficit, 12.6% for bladder dysfunction, and 21.2% for bowel dysfunction. Moreover, 23.3%-40.2% of patients suffered deterioration after surgery during the follow-up period. Twenty-eight patients underwent revision untethering surgery. In these patients, the remission rate decreased by 5.6%-16.7% compared with the primary operation. Moreover, most patients (58.8%-70.6%) experienced no benefits after revision surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: With a possible high risk of recurrence, further exploration of the indications and timing of the untethering surgery is needed. Conservative treatment and omnidirectional care might be a better choice for patients with retethering with recurrent symptoms.