{Reference Type}: Case Reports
{Title}: Misinterpretation of Anogenital Findings and Misdiagnosis of Child Sexual Abuse: The Role of the Forensic Pathologist.
{Author}: Pelletti G;Tambuscio S;Montisci M;Snenghi R;
{Journal}: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
{Volume}: 29
{Issue}: 2
{Year}: Apr 2016
{Factor}: 2.046
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.10.012
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>The interpretation of anogenital postmortem findings is an issue of main concern, because the nature and appearance of anogenital tissues during the postmortem interval is not widely known by health providers.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>An 8-year-old girl died in the hospital 48 hours after hospitalization. On the basis of the atypical anogenital findings, the health care professionals notified the fact to the Public Prosecutor as an alleged child abuse. The forensic pathologist ruled out this possibility, interpreting the anal findings due to physiological postmortem anal alterations and to the insertion of suppositories before death.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Forensic pathological analysis should be included in routine postmortem evaluation in the case of suspected child sexual abuse, because normal postmortem findings could be misinterpreted by physicians, whose sole experience is on the basis of antemortem scenarios.