{Reference Type}: Evaluation Study
{Title}: Economic evaluation of the restriction in the use piroxicam in Spain.
{Author}: Maciá Martínez MÁ;
{Journal}: Reumatol Clin
{Volume}: 11
{Issue}: 6
{Year}: Nov-Dec 2015
暂无{DOI}: 10.1016/j.reuma.2014.12.003
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>A retrospective economic evaluation was performed on the restriction of the use of piroxicam in Spain, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, with a proven higher risk of serious gastrointestinal complications compared to other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with the objective of putting the relevance of these activities into context.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis and a budget impact analysis were performed. Costs and cases of serious gastrointestinal complications were compared in the non-intervention (use of piroxicam) and the intervention scenarios (use of other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The cost of serious gastrointestinal complications was obtained from the Diagnosis Related Groups and the cost of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from usage data in the Spanish national health system. The risk of serious gastrointestinal complications was obtained from epidemiological studies.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The regulatory intervention was the dominant option. In that sense, 0.81 euros per treated patient were saved, 2.75 cases of serious gastrointestinal complications were avoided per 10,000 patients and 578,608 euros were saved in total in Spain in the first year following the intervention.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>It is possible to perform complete economical evaluations on pharmacovigilance actions. The intervention performed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices, AEMPS on piroxicam not only achieved the objective of preventing adverse drug reactions but also resulted in significant economical savings even under conservative assumptions.