%0 Journal Article
%T Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction after SCI: A Comparison between India and Canada.
%A Hirsch A
%A Tyagi N
%A Goel S
%A Chhabra HS
%A Fallah N
%A Noonan VK
%A Sehrawat S
%A Saini A
%A Barnwal A
%A Krassioukov AV
%J Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil
%V 30
%N 3
%D 2024
%M 39139774
暂无%R 10.46292/sci23-00058
%X UNASSIGNED: The inclusion of people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) in research has allowed for an informed understanding of priorities of recovery of which bowel dysfunction and bladder dysfunction have been continuously identified. Research has also demonstrated the global disparities in SCI outcomes particularly when comparing high- and low-income countries. Currently, there is a lack of direct comparison between countries when assessing SCI outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: This is an exploratory study to better understand bowel and bladder dysfunction amongst individuals with SCI in India and Canada.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 33 participants were analyzed. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing demographic information and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score, Wexner score, Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS), and the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL). Continuous data were compared using t tests. For not normally distributed data, the independent Mann-Whitney U test was used. Categorical variables were evaluated for association using Fisher's exact or chi-square test, depending on the sample size.
UNASSIGNED: Independent Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated that the Canadian participants had poorer bowel function with higher total NBD scores (p = .007) and less frequent bowel movements (p = .036), and they were more likely to experience uneasiness, headaches, and perspiration during bowel movements (p < .001). NBSS results indicated a small but significantly higher proportion of the Indian participants were unsatisfied or unhappy with their bladder function (p = .049). The distribution of Wexner and I-QOL scores were the same across countries.
UNASSIGNED: Potential explanations for differences include lifestyle, management, financial resources, patient and caregiver education, and societal pressures, which are all heavily influenced by cultural, geographical, and economic circumstances.