%0 Journal Article %T The cost-effectiveness of a co-managed care model for elderly hip fracture patients in China: a modelling study. %A Xu L %A Yang M %A Zhang X %A Zhang J %A He J %A Wen L %A Wang X %A Shi Z %A Hu S %A Sun F %A Gong Z %A Sun M %A Peng K %A Ye P %A Ma R %A Wu X %A Chen M %A Jan S %A Ivers R %A Tian M %A Si L %J Lancet Reg Health West Pac %V 49 %N 0 %D 2024 Aug %M 39135908 %F 8.559 %R 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101149 %X UNASSIGNED: The clinical effectiveness of multidisciplinary co-managed care for hip fracture patients in China has been demonstrated in a multicenter non-randomized controlled study. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care.
UNASSIGNED: The study is based on a multicenter clinical trial (n = 2071) in China. We developed a state transition microsimulation model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care compared with usual care for hip fracture patients from healthcare system perspective. The costs incorporated into the model included hospitalization costs, post-discharge expenses, and secondary fracture therapy costs. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and effects were discounted at 5% annually. A simulation cycle length of 1-year and a lifetime horizon were employed. The cost-effectiveness threshold was established at USD 37,118. To address uncertainties, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.
UNASSIGNED: In the base case analysis, the co-managed care group had a lifetime cost of USD 31,571 and achieved an effectiveness of 3.22 QALYs, whereas the usual care group incurred a cost of USD 27,878 and gained 2.85 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 9981 per QALY gained; thus the co-managed care model was cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness was sensitive to the age of having hip fractures and hospitalization costs in the intervention group.
UNASSIGNED: The co-managed care in hip fracture patients represents value for money, and should be scaled up and prioritized for funding in China.
UNASSIGNED: The study is supported by Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2022-1-2071, 2018-1-2071).