%0 Journal Article
%T Longitudinal Assessment of Communication with Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.
%A Slatore CG
%A Golden SE
%A Schweiger L
%A Ilea I
%A Sullivan DR
%A Rice SPM
%A Wiener RS
%A Datta S
%A Davis JM
%A Melzer AC
%J Chest
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Aug 10
%M 39134143
%F 10.262
%R 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817
%X BACKGROUND: Many organizations recommend clinicians use structured communication processes, referred to as "shared decision making," to improve patient-reported outcomes for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS).
OBJECTIVE: Which components of high-quality patient-centered communication are associated with decision regret and distress?
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, repeated measures, cohort study among patients undergoing lung cancer screening in three different healthcare systems. We surveyed participants using validated measures of decision regret, decision satisfaction, distress, and patient-clinician communication domains up to a year after the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for LCS. For longitudinal analyses, we applied a series of generalized estimating equations to measure the association of the "patient as person" communication domain, screening knowledge, and decision concordance with decision regret and distress.
RESULTS: When assessed 2-4 weeks after the LDCT, 202 (58.9%) and 8 (2.3%) of 343 total respondents reported mild and moderate/severe decision regret, respectively, while 29 (9.2%) participants of 315 total reported mild distress and 19 (6.0%) moderate or greater distress. The mean ± SD decision satisfaction scores (0 to 10 scale) were 9.82 ± 0.89, 9.08 ± 1.54, and 6.13 ± 3.40 among those with no, mild, and moderate/severe regret respectively. Distress scores remained low after the LDCT, even among those with nodules. Patient-centered communication domains were not associated with decision regret or distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LCS rarely experience moderate or greater decision regret and distress. Although many participants reported mild decision regret, most were very satisfied over the year after their LDCT for LCS. Communication processes were not associated with regret and distress, suggesting that it may be challenging for communication interventions to reduce the harms of LCS.