%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of the flexural strength of printed and milled denture base materials.
%A Alshali S
%A Basunbul G
%A Basunbul A
%A Giordano Ii R
%J BMC Oral Health
%V 24
%N 1
%D 2024 Aug 10
%M 39127617
%F 3.747
%R 10.1186/s12903-024-04695-8
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>To evaluate the flexural strength of digitally milled and printed denture base materials.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The materials tested were Lucitone 199 denture base disc (Dentsply Sirona), AvaDent denture base puck (AvaDent), KeyMill denture base disc (Keystone), Lucitone digital print denture base resin (Dentsply Sirona), Formlab denture base resin (Formlabs), and Dentca base resin II (Dentca). Sixty bar-shaped specimens of each material were prepared for flexural strength testing and were divided into five groups: control, thermocycled, fatigue cycled, and repair using two different materials. The flexural strength and modulus were tested using a 3-point bend test performed on an Instron Universal Testing Machine with a 1kN load cell. The specimens were centered under a loading apparatus with a perpendicular alignment. The loading rate was a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Each specimen was loaded with a force until failure occurred. A one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data, followed by Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05).<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The milled materials exhibited higher flexural strength than the printed materials. Thermocycling and fatigue reduce the flexural strengths of printed and milled materials. The repaired groups exhibited flexural strengths of 32.80% and 30.67% of the original flexural strengths of printed and milled materials, respectively. Nevertheless, the type of repair material affected the flexural strength of the printed materials; the composite resin exhibited higher flexural strength values than the acrylic resin.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The milled denture base materials showed higher flexural strength than the printed ones.