%0 Journal Article %T Clinical Manifestations. %A Xiao Z %A Wu W %A Ma X %A Wu J %A Liang X %A Zhao Q %A Ding D %J Alzheimers Dement %V 19 %N 0 %D 2023 Dec %M 39112080 %F 16.655 %R 10.1002/alz.078171 %X BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction has been reported for its association with cognitive impairment and incident dementia. However, the underlying role of neurodegeneration in this relationship is not fully understood.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study included participants from the Shanghai Aging Study (SAS) who were 60 years or older and diagnosed as dementia-free at baseline and completed at least one follow-up interview between 2010 and 2022. At baseline, olfactory identification function was assessed by the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks Smell test (SSST-12). Olfactory dysfunction was defined as SSST-12 < 7, 6, and 5 in three age groups of participants with (age < 70, 70 ≤ age < 80, and age ≥ 80), respectively, according to previously reported normative data of olfaction in the SAS. Baseline blood Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) was quantified using the ultra-sensitive Single Molecular Array technology (Quanterix), and dichotomized into low and high levels according to the median concentration. Multiple cognitive function assessments were administered by the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and follow-ups. We used the linear mixed-effect model to fit the MMSE trajectories in participants with and without olfactory dysfunction adjusting for baseline age, sex, education year, smoking, and APOE ε4, with person-specific MMSE intercept and slope. Stratified analysis was conducted in participants with low and high NfL.
RESULTS: Among 1125 participants included in this study, 296 were defined as having olfactory dysfunction at baseline. Less education, higher proportion of APOE ε4 allele, and lower baseline and follow-up MMSE scores were observed in participants with olfactory dysfunction (Table 1). During the median 9.4 years follow-up, participants with olfactory dysfunction at baseline evidenced a faster MMSE decline compared with those without olfactory dysfunction (b [95% CI]: -0.08 [-0.15, -0.02], P = 0.02) (Figure 1). Such association remained statistically significant (-0.18 [-0.31, -0.06], P = 0.005) in the subgroup with high NfL, but not in the subgroup with low NfL (0.004 [-0.07, 0.07], P = 0.92) (Figure 2).
CONCLUSIONS: Blood NfL may modify the association of olfactory dysfunction with long-term cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. In individuals with high potential neurodegeneration, olfactory dysfunction may be an independent indicator of future cognitive deterioration.