%0 Journal Article
%T A modified arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair is effective for delaminated rotator cuff tears.
%A Fang S
%A Wang X
%A Xu P
%A Sun H
%A Jiang Z
%A Yan L
%A Wang Y
%A Liu J
%A Li H
%J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Aug 6
%M 39105431
%F 4.114
%R 10.1002/ksa.12412
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of delaminated rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and evaluate the clinical outcomes of a modified arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair for delaminated RCTs.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Patients with full-thickness RCTs, who underwent arthroscopic suture bridge repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence of delamination. Delaminated RCTs were treated using a modified en masse suture bridge technique, while nondelaminated RCTs received a conventional suture bridge technique. Preoperative and postoperative Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were determined to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out to identify the integrity and retear of the repaired rotator cuff.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>A total of 172 patients were included in our study cohort, in which 67 (39%) delaminated RCTs were confirmed intraoperatively. The prevalence of delamination was significantly higher in large tears (53/102, 52%) compared to medium tears (14/70, 20%) (p < 0.001). No significant differences in age (n.s.) or gender (n.s.) were observed between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in Constant and ASES scores postoperatively (both p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the groups (n.s.). The retear rates were 2/67 (3.0%) in the delamination group and 3/105 (2.9%) in the nondelamination group, showing no significant difference (n.s.).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The modified arthroscopic en masse suture bridge technique was effective for repairing delaminated RCTs, yielding favourable clinical outcomes comparable to those of nondelaminated tears.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Level IV.