%0 Journal Article
%T Objective evaluation, using computed tomography, of round window access for cochlear implantation.
%A Radomska K
%A Mielnik M
%A Gostyński M
%A Dzięciołowska-Baran E
%J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Aug 4
%M 39098956
%F 3.236
%R 10.1007/s00405-024-08873-w
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The aim of this study was to determine optimal radiological parameters for assessment of the round window approach in cochlear implantation surgery.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Patients undergoing cochlear implantation at the Department of Otolaryngology in Szczecin, between 2015 and 2022 inclusive, were eligible for the study. Radiological assessments were performed according to eight parameters (seven proposed in the literature) and visibility clinical assessments were made intra-operatively on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 - not visible, 5 - fully visible). Visibility assessments of the round window niche (RWN) and round window membrane (RWM) allowed the difference (RWN minus RWM) to be used as a clinical assessment of the size of the overhang over the round window.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Computed tomography images of 57 ears from 52 patients were analyzed in terms of round window access. The study group included 26 females and 26 males, ranging in age from 1 year to 80 years, with a median age of 41 years. In clinical assessment, round window visibility was rated as 5, after removal of the bone overhang, in 69% of patients. Cochlear access through the round window was achieved in 39 (68%) cases, extended access through the round window in 13 (23%) cases and cochleostomy was performed in 5 (9%) cases. Statistically significant ordinal correlations with round-window access were found using one parameter from the literature (Chen_Angle) and from our proposal (RWM_prediction). From parameters describing the bone overhang of the round window, positive correlations (using Kendall rank tests) were found using parameters from the literature (Sarafraz_OH and Mehanna_OH).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Radiological measurements describing access to the round window which determine the angle based on the anatomy of the posterior wall of the auditory canal and the position of the facial nerve were found to be of the highest value.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>In the future, the use of algorithms for computed tomography evaluation and robot-assisted surgery will require parameters for assessing round window access, for surgery planning and choice of electrode. The parameters proposed by various authors are summarized, allowing researchers to assess their usefulness in further clinical practice.