%0 Journal Article
%T Does it affect the live birth rates to have a maximum endometrial thickness of 7, 8, or 9 mm in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles?
%A Kadour Peero E
%A Feferkorn I
%A Hadad-Liven S
%A Dahan MH
%J Obstet Gynecol Sci
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Aug 2
%M 39091127
暂无%R 10.5468/ogs.22316
%X <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>To assess the effect of endometrial thickness (EMT) on live birth rates (LBR) in women with endometrial lining between 7.0-9.9 mm.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent fresh and frozen embryo transfers between 2008 and 2018, grouped according to their maximum EMT; group 1: 7.0-7.9 mm, group 2: 8.0-8.9 mm, and group 3: 9.0-9.9 mm and underwent blastocyst transfer.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>The study included 7091 in-vitro fertilization cycles: 1,385 in group 1, 3,000 in group 2, and 2,706 in group 3. The combined LBR was 22.2%. The mean age of women at oocyte retrieval day was 36.2±4.5 years. There was no difference in female age at oocyte retrieval or in the quality of embryos transferred between the three groups. Group 1 had more diagnoses of diminished ovarian reserve (25.5% vs. 19.5% and 19.1%; P=0.001) and less male factor infertility compared with groups 2 and 3, respectively (25.0% vs. 28.8% and 28.5%; P=0.02). LBR was higher with increasing endometrial thickness, groups 2 vs. group 1 (22.0% vs. 17.4%; P=0.0004), group 3 vs. group 1 (25.0% vs. 17.2%; P<0.001), and group 3 vs. group 2 (25.0% vs. 22.0%; P=0.008). After controlling for confounding factors, these three groups did not differ in LBR (group 1 vs. group 2, OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.4; P=0.54 and group 1 vs. group 3, OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P=0.24).<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Live birth rates in women with endometrial thickness between 7.0-9.9 mm were not affected by different cut-offs when blastocyst transfer was performed.