%0 Journal Article
%T Classification systems for chronic pelvic pain in males: a systematic review.
%A Cyr MP
%A Nahon I
%A Worman R
%A Cowley D
%A Hodges PW
%J BJU Int
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 29
%M 39075791
%F 5.969
%R 10.1111/bju.16485
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To systematically review the classification systems for male chronic pelvic pain (CPP).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Web of Science were searched. Any publication, with no restriction to publication date, was eligible. Publications had to propose a classification system for CPP in males or provide additional information of a system that had been identified. Systems were assessed with an adapted Critical Appraisal of Classification Systems tool.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>A total of 33 relevant publications were identified, with 22 proposing an original classification system. Systems aimed to: (i) diagnose CPP and/or differentially diagnose CPP from other conditions, (ii) differentially diagnose subtypes within CPP, or (iii) identify features that could inform underlying mechanisms and/or treatment selection. Conditions referred to as chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome were most represented. Clinical signs/symptoms, pathoanatomical investigations, and presumed pain mechanisms were used for classification. Quality of systems was low to moderate, implying limitations to consider for their interpretation.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Many classification systems for CPP in males exist. Careful consideration of their intended purpose is required. Future work should examine whether outcomes for patients are improved when decisions are guided by their use.