%0 Journal Article
%T Pressure ulcers/injuries prevention in emergency services: A scoping review.
%A Sardo PMG
%A Moreira IF
%A Mouta LFP
%A Santos MS
%A Ramos RC
%J J Tissue Viability
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 22
%M 39068087
%F 3.374
%R 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.011
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To map the available evidence on nursing care provided to prevent the development of pressure ulcers/injuries in emergency services.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Scoping review that follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and the Meta-Analyses extensions for Scoping Reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC mnemonic. The main variables of interest were the nursing care provided to prevent the development of pressure ulcers/injuries (Condition) reported in studies developed in hospital emergency services (Context) with adult participants (Population). The scoping review protocol was registered on the OSF platform.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>During the selection process, 175 articles were identified in different databases. Applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 studies were included in this scoping review. The preventive measures for the development of pressure ulcers/injuries were grouped into 9 categories: "risk factors and risk assessment", "support surfaces", "dressings for pressure ulcer/injury prevention", "skin and tissue assessment", "repositioning and early mobilization", "preventive skin care", "nutrition in pressure ulcer/injury prevention", "health education" and "vital signs management". The instruments for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries mentioned in the studies are the Braden, Waterlow and Norton scales. The most documented tool for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries in hospital emergency services was the Braden Scale.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>International literature identified several preventive interventions that could be implemented in emergency services to avoid pressure ulcers/injuries development. However, is crucial that those preventive interventions were systematic implemented (in combination) since hospital admission.