%0 Journal Article
%T Impact of Infrapopliteal Revascularisation Establishing In Line Flow to the Wound in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.
%A Iida O
%A Takahara M
%A Ohura N
%A Hata Y
%A Kodama A
%A Soga Y
%A Yamaoka T
%A Higuchi Y
%A Azuma N
%A
%J Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 26
%M 39067506
%F 6.427
%R 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.024
%X OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of infrapopliteal (IP) revascularisation establishing in line flow to the wound (IFW) on wound healing in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI), using a core laboratory assessment for wounds and in line flow.
METHODS: The Wound directed Angiosome RevasculaRIsation apprOach to patients with cRitical limb iSchaemia (WARRIORS) multicentre observational study enrolled patients with CLTI with tissue loss undergoing IP revascularisation in Japan, with scheduled two year follow up. The primary outcome measure was complete wound healing, defined as achievement of complete epithelialisation of all wounds without major amputation. IP revascularisation establishing IFW was defined as revascularisation after which a tibiopedal artery that actually fed an injured pedal unit was patent. The incidence of wound healing was compared between the IFW and non-IFW groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the propensity score.
RESULTS: A total of 440 patients with CLTI (median age, 75 years; male, 64.1%; diabetes mellitus, 72.0%; dialysis, 57.7%) with tissue loss (Wound, Ischaemia, and foot Infection stage 4, 66.4%) who underwent IP revascularisation (endovascular procedure, n = 304; bypass grafting, n = 136) between October 2017 and June 2020 were registered. During a median follow up of 23.6 months, 51.1% achieved wound healing. Successful IP revascularisation with IFW was achieved in 68.2%. After analysis, the IFW group had a higher rate of wound healing than the non-IFW group (34.5 vs. 16.1 per 100 person years; p = .030). The association between IFW and wound healing was not statistically different between patients undergoing bypass grafting and those undergoing an endovascular procedure (p for interaction = .38). There was no statistically significant interaction effect between IFW and direct revascularisation for wound healing (p for interaction = .51).
CONCLUSIONS: IP revascularisation establishing IFW was statistically significantly associated with a higher wound healing rate in patients with CLTI.