%0 Journal Article
%T Physical activity and risk of lung cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies.
%A Qie R
%A Han M
%A Huang H
%A Sun P
%A Xie Y
%A He J
%A Zhang Y
%J J Natl Cancer Cent
%V 3
%N 1
%D 2023 Mar
%M 39036308
暂无%R 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.12.003
%X <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>To synthesize the knowledge about the association of total physical activity (TPA), leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), occupational physical activity (OPA) and lung cancer risk and explore the dose-response relationship between LTPA level and lung cancer.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>PubMed and Web of Science were searched up to 17 November 2021. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by random-effects or fixed-effects model. The dose-response analysis was conducted with restricted cubic splines.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>We identified 25 articles (42 cohort studies) that assessed the physical activity-lung cancer association, including 9,983,295 study participants and 85,988 incident cases of lung cancer. When comparing the highest to the lowest level of TPA and LTPA, lung cancer risk reduced 22% (RR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.86) and 12% (RR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.93), respectively. We found an approximately U-shaped association between LTPA and lung cancer (P non-linearity < 0.001), with the lowest risk at 15 metabolic equivalent of task hours per week (h/wk) of LTPA. Compared to participants with sitting occupations, lung cancer risk significantly increased among those being unemployed (RR, 1.33; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.51) or with standing occupations (RR, 1.37; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.63), but not among those with light or high OPA.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Our meta-analysis supported a protective effect of TPA and LTPA, but not OPA, on lung cancer risk. The novel finding of a U-shaped association between LTPA and lung cancer risk warrants further investigation.