%0 Journal Article %T Effectiveness of a group psychological intervention to reduce psychosocial distress in adolescents in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. %A Hamdani SU %A Huma ZE %A Malik A %A Tamizuddin-Nizami A %A Javed H %A Minhas FA %A Jordans MJD %A Sijbrandij M %A Suleman N %A Baneen UU %A Bryant RA %A van Ommeren M %A Rahman A %A Wang D %J Lancet Child Adolesc Health %V 8 %N 8 %D 2024 Aug %M 39025557 %F 37.746 %R 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00101-9 %X BACKGROUND: Emotional problems in adolescents living in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain largely unaddressed; key reasons include a scarcity of trained mental health professionals and unavailability of evidence-based, scalable psychological interventions. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a non-specialist-delivered, group psychological intervention to reduce psychosocial distress in school-going adolescents in Pakistan.
METHODS: In a two-arm, single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial, eligible public school clusters from a rural subdistrict of Gujar Khan, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, were randomised (1:1, stratified by sex) using permuted block randomisation into intervention (n=20) and wait-list control (n=20) groups. Adolescents aged 13-15 years who provided informed assent and caregivers' consent were screened for psychosocial distress using the youth-reported Pediatric Symptoms Checklist (PSC; total psychosocial distress scores from 0 to 70), and those scoring 28 or more and their caregivers were enrolled into the trial. Adolescents in the intervention group received seven weekly group sessions and their caregivers received three biweekly group sessions in school settings from trained non-specialists. The primary outcome was change from baseline in the total PSC scores at 3 months post-intervention. The trial was registered prospectively with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, ISRCTN17755448.
RESULTS: From the 40 school clusters that were included, 282 adolescents in the intervention group and 284 adolescents in the wait-list control group were enrolled between Nov 2 and Nov 30, 2021. At 3 months, adolescents in the intervention group had significantly lower mean total score on the PSC compared with adolescents in the control group (mean difference in change from baseline 3·48 [95% CI 1·66-5·29], p=0·0002, effect size 0·38 [95% CI 0·18-0·57]; adjusted mean difference 3·26 (95% CI 1·46-5·06], p=0·0004, effect size 0·35 (0·16-0·55). No adverse events were reported in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The group psychological intervention most likely represents a feasible and effective option for adolescents with psychosocial distress in school settings.
BACKGROUND: UK Medical Research Council, Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, Department of Health and Social Care.
UNASSIGNED: For the Urdu translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.