%0 Journal Article
%T Comparative post-therapeutic dosimetry between 2D planar-based and hybrid-based methods for personalized Lu-177 treatment.
%A Handayani W
%A Chantadisai M
%A Phromphao B
%A Noipinit N
%A Pasawang P
%A Khamwan K
%J Ann Nucl Med
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 18
%M 39023826
%F 2.258
%R 10.1007/s12149-024-01960-2
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This study aims to compare the calculated absorbed dose in target organs and tumors obtained using the different imaging protocols and the calculation methodologies implemented by HERMES HybridViewer dosimetry software for 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Multiple time-point whole-body planar images and one SPECT/CT image were acquired from 18 patients including 177Lu-PSMA I&T (13 patients) and 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment (5 patients) after administration of 3.80-8.58 GBq injected activity. The regions of interest were drawn in the whole body, kidneys, liver, urinary bladder, salivary glands, and tumors to determine the time-integrated activity (TIA) in source organs. Absorbed doses in target organs were calculated according to the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) scheme using the HERMES HybridViewer dosimetry integrated with OLINDA/EXM V.2.1 that utilizes the non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) for computational digital phantom.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The planar-based dosimetry showed a higher dose per injected activity compared to the hybrid-based dosimetry, primarily due to organ overlap. The highest difference in absorbed dose between the imaging scenarios was observed in the spleen with a variation of up to 51.6%, while the difference for other target organs and tumors was less than 40%.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The dosimetry calculation derived from the 2D planar-based method consistently demonstrates a significantly higher absorbed dose in organs and tumors compared with the hybrid-based method. However, the hybrid method outperforms the planar method in terms of tumor visualization and overlap-free organ delineation.