%0 Journal Article
%T The impact of the Woven EndoBridge device on the treatment of anterior circulation wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: a single-center experience.
%A El Naamani K
%A Momin AA
%A Mouchtouris N
%A Hunt A
%A Lawall CL
%A Ghanem M
%A Koorie MP
%A El-Hajj J
%A Vinjamuri S
%A Alhussein A
%A AlHussein R
%A Tjoumakaris SI
%A Gooch MR
%A Rosenwasser RH
%A Jabbour PM
%J J Neurosurg
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 12
%M 38996401
%F 5.408
%R 10.3171/2024.4.JNS24436
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The paucity of literature comparing Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization to microsurgical clipping for anterior circulation wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) underscores the need for further investigation into the optimal management of this patient subpopulation. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of endovascular and microsurgical treatment of WNBAs before and after the introduction of the WEB device. In addition, the authors performed a comparison of demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and treatment outcomes in patients before and after the introduction of the WEB device.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This study was a retrospective review of the usage rate of different treatment modalities for WNBAs before and after the WEB device was approved by the US FDA on September 27, 2018.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The study cohort comprised 235 patients with anterior circulation WNBAs treated at the authors' institution, including 127 aneurysms treated pre-WEB and 108 treated post-WEB. Generally, the rate of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation WNBAs was significantly higher post-WEB (86.1% vs 46.5%, p < 0.001), while the rate of clipping was significantly lower (13.9% vs 53.5%, p < 0.001). During follow-up, the rate of adequate aneurysm occlusion (Raymond-Roy occlusion classification [RROC] grades 1 and 2) was nonsignificantly higher in the post-WEB cohort (83.9% vs 78.5%, p = 0.34), while the rate of RROC grade 3 was nonsignificantly higher in the pre-WEB cohort (21.5% vs 16.1%, p = 0.34). Additionally, and although nonsignificant, the rates of recurrence (pre-WEB 25.3% vs post-WEB 14.9%, p = 0.12) and retreatment (pre-WEB 22.8% vs post-WEB 14.9%, p = 0.22) were higher in the pre-WEB cohort. Recurrence was assessed before retreatment.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>After the introduction of the WEB device, the rate of endovascular treatment of WNBAs increased while the rate of microsurgical clipping decreased. It is essential for neurointerventionalists to become familiar with the indications, advantages, and shortcomings of all these different techniques to be able to match the right patient with the right technique to produce the best outcome.